As if I needed more ammo, now I get a wishy-washy O’Mara who makes it seem like George is guilty to criticize.
In the last hearing we got to hear of a hearing O’Mara wanted he feels will take up most of a day to go over. Because of the interrupting judge we never got to hear what that hearing he wants is going to be on.
Thanks to the media, ugh that’s rare, we know. It’s a hearing on W11’s 911 call with the yells for help from George on it. It seems pretty clear that what O’Mara wants is to allow the call to be heard by the jury without any argument or testifying from witnesses and experts as to who is yelling, which is George.
Fine, whatever, it’s a wash with witnesses anyway because one side will say it’s Trayvon and the other George, no surprise.
The science; the FBI already told the state why a comparison can’t be done so no need to regurgitate that here.
None of that concerns me. If this is what O’Mara wants then that doesn’t concern me either.
What concerns me is apparently O’Mara can’t open his mouth and sound like he’s actually defending George and worse still here in this interview we get “Gee willikers I thought it was George screaming but golly gee I guess I’m just not so sure anymore”. That’s me paraphrasing of course but go ahead and listen for yourself especially @1:10 of the video.
I get what he’s trying to say but damn, better to just say the science can’t prove it either way, so we’re just going to let the jury decide, listen to the call and take away from it what they will. He could even go on to say that though the science can’t prove it, logic does, so in that it was George screaming for help. Is that really so hard O’Mara?
Motion for Evidentiary Hearing