Few highlights:
52:58 Trayvon ran out of pot in Sanford may have looked for more in Sanford says O’Mara
57:28 Video Trayvon taped of two buddies of Trayvon beating up homeless guy says O’Mara
2:06:21 Photograph of underage girl on Trayvons phone
Audio and Video eventually fall out of sync a bit.
Starts @34:15
(Sometimes a YouTube video will abruptly end for no apparent reason. If that happens I suggest watching it on YouTube itself and reloading from there if necessary)
1) 34:15 STATE’S MOTION REQUESTING COURT TO COMPEL SHELLIE ZIMMERMAN TO TESTIFY AT DEPOSITION(Granted)
39:55 George appearance notice
2) 40:04 STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING OPINION AS TO APPROPRIATE PENALTY OR DISREGARD OF LAW(Granted)
3) 40:49 STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY(Granted)
4) 41:45 STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING CALLING OF WITNESSES(Granted)
5) 43:20 State’s Motion in Limine Regarding CVSA Testing(Granted)
6) 45:09 STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING SELF-SERVING HEARSAY STATEMENTS OF DEFENDANT(Granted)
7) 47:58 STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TRAYVON MARTIN(Granted)
8) 1:06:40 STATE’S MOTION TO LIMIT/EXCLUDE IMPROPER OPINION EVIDENCE(Granted)
9) 1:10:04 STATE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER/MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TOXICOLOGY(Granted)
10) 1:20:12 DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ANONYMOUS JURY(semi-granted/continued to May 31 hearing hearing canceled)
11) 1:38:27 MOTION TO ALLOW JURY TO INSPECT THE INCIDENT SCENE DURING TRIAL(Denied)
12) 1:44:29 REDACTED MOTION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL WITNESS DISCLOSURE(Granted)
13) 1:45:31 MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY(Resolved/Continued June 6)
14) 1:45:50 MOTION TO ESTABLISH REASONABLE EXPERT FEE(Sort of denied)
1:53:37 (Media argues more on photographing jury, hearing May 31 1:30)
15) 2:01:20 Motion for Sanctions Against State Attorney’s Office for Discovery Violations and Request for Judicial Inquiry Into Violations(Continued on June 6 and possibly June 7)
16) 2:12:24 MOTION TO ALLOW EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY AT HEARING ON MAY 28, 2013 TO BE BY VIDEO CONFERENCING(Granted)
17) 2:12:55 States Third Motion For Gag Order(Denied)
18) 2:23:05 Defendants Motion to Continue(Denied)
2:33:36 Recap
2:34:50 Jury stuff/questionnaire/scheduling
2:40:54 Court in recess
Presser volume is louder than hearing
Robert Zimmerman Jr. Statement
Crump et al. 9:30
O’Mara 37:39
Possible Live coverage of Hearings links
For the live feeds I usually have the best luck at http://livewire.wesh.com and http://www.clickorlando.com However be sure to check the main pages of the links provided above to be sure.
NBC feed(link shown at top banner)
http://www.nbcnews.com/
WESH feed
http://livewire.wesh.com/Event/Defense_to_ask_for_delay_in_George_Zimmerman_trial
Click Orlando feed
http://www.clickorlando.com/watch-live-george-zimmerman-case/-/1637238/19907450/-/127j9xk/-/index.html?showAds=0
WFTV Feed
http://www.wftv.com/s/zimmerman-livestream/
There are many types of screen recording software. I use HyperCam 2(use at your own risk of course)
http://download.cnet.com/HyperCam/3000-13633_4-10004511.html
http://download.cnet.com/1770-20_4-0.html?query=screen+recorder&platformSelect=Windows&tag=srch%3Ba&searchtype=downloads&filterName=platform%3DWindows&filter=platform%3DWindows
I’ve used other screen recorders, I just happen to be using HyperCam right now. If you know of a better one for long recording like over 2 hours please let me know your experience and software.:
Camtasia Studio is good but costly.
BSR Screen Recorder is good, inexpensive.
http://camstudio.org/ Free
I would also suggest an audio recording as a backup. I use Sony Sound Forge but I’m sure there are free ones that can serve the purpose just as well.
http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/soundforgesoftware
I suggest practicing with the software beforehand and also setting up early.
Be sure to check the following sites for threads on this hearing as well:
Random Topics GZ Thread
TalkLeft
TalkLeft GZ Forum
The Last Refuge
Nettles
The following motions are assumed to be heard at the next hearing, subject to change of course and any new motions in the meantime will be added here.
NOTICE OF HEARING for May 28, 2013
http://www.flcourts18.org/PDF/Press_Releases/Amended%20Notice%20of%20Hearing%205%2021%2013.pdf
MOTION TO ALLOW EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY AT HEARING ON MAY 28, 2013 TO BE BY VIDEO CONFERENCING
REDACTED MOTION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL WITNESS DISCLOSURE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ANONYMOUS JURY
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/court-documents/164-defendant-s-motion-for-anonymous-jury
TalkLeft GZ Forum
http://forums.talkleft.com/index.php/topic,2397.0.html
MOTION TO ALLOW JURY TO INSPECT THE INCIDENT SCENE DURING TRIAL
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/court-documents/162-motion-to-allow-jury-to-inspect-incident-scene-during-trial
TalkLeft GZ Forum
http://forums.talkleft.com/index.php/topic,2395.0.html
STATE’S MOTION REQUESTING COURT TO COMPEL SHELLIE ZIMMERMAN TO TESTIFY AT DEPOSITION
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/court-documents/163-state-s-motion-requesting-court-to-compel-shellie-zimmerman-to-testify-at-deposition
TalkLeft GZ Forum
http://forums.talkleft.com/index.php/topic,2396.msg109476/topicseen.html
The Last Refuge
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/05/09/shellies-issue-state-of-florida-files-motion-to-compel-shellie-zimmerman-finish-deposition/
MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY OF EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY
(This motion may be a separate hearing)
http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/court-documents/157-motion-for-evidentiary-hearing
STATE’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
TalkLeft GZ Forum
http://forums.talkleft.com/index.php/topic,2392.0.html
MOTION TO ESTABLISH REASONABLE EXPERT FEE
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052113_reasonable_fee.pdf
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING OPINION AS TO APPROPRIATE PENALTY OR DISREGARD OF LAW
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING CALLING OF WITNESSES
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING SELF-SERVING HEARSAY STATEMENTS OF DEFENDANT
Defendant’s Reply to the STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING SELF-SERVING HEARSAY STATEMENTS OF DEFENDANT
052313_reply_to_hearsay
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TRAYVON MARTIN
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TRAYVON MARTIN
STATE’S MOTION TO LIMIT/EXCLUDE IMPROPER OPINION EVIDENCE
Defendant’s Reply to the STATE’S MOTION TO LIMIT/EXCLUDE IMPROPER OPINION EVIDENCE
052313_reply_to_opinion
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER/MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TOXICOLOGY
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO STATE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER/MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TOXICOLOGY
http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0513/052113_reply_limine_toxicology.pdf
STATE’S MOTION REQUESTING COURT TO ORDER DEFENDANT TO COMPLY WITH THEIR DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS
States Third Motion For Gag Order
052313_gag3
TalkLeft on the Gag Order
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2013/5/23/223419/829/crimenews/George-Zimmerman-Continuance-Sanctions-and-Gag-Order-Sought
State’s Motion in Limine Regarding CVSA Testing
052313_state_limine_cvsa
Defendants’ Motion to Continue
052313_motion_to_continue
Motion for Sanctions Against State Attorney’s Office for Discovery Violations and Request for Judicial Inquiry Into Violations
motion_for_sanctions
Feel free to comment but please try to limit yourself to the topics at hand. This post will remain sticky until a couple of days after the hearing. I will attempt to record it and comment as it occurs. The comments will remain open until the hearing however I will post a link here to the first comment below when the hearing starts so one can avoid prior comments if they wish. I hope to also provide an after hearing post as soon as I’m able.
DiwataMan 
Thanks Dman
You have inspired me to get a separate thread started… I have been updating the sites likely to have Live Streaming, so the new thread is a better source of those links:
HEARING: Various matters? (5-28-13)
http://randomtopics.org/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=925&p=36735#p36733
Excellent, I’ll include your link in the body above as soon as I can. Still building this post and accidentally hit post before finishing it, lol and now having some strange issue hyperlinking TalkLeft GZ Forum posts.
I finally got back in.
I don’t understand why you had a problem. PM me at RT if I can help.
No need.. I figured out that I was logged out but I did not do that. It has happened before but usually I get a notice at other WP blogs. IOW, I stay logged in to all blogs.
The state’s motion to compel Shellie to testify at deposition might be heard before May 28th too, assuming the state hears the motion to disqualify voice expert before May 28. I have that thought just because the court will not want to cause a squeeze for time to the state.
Has anyone heard about which Saturday they are going to be having the evidentiary hearing that was mentioned in the last hearing in court?
Can someone correct me if I am wrong in my understanding on this Shelly business.
As I understand it:
1. Shellie is on the defense witness list.
2. The State wants to depose Shellie BECAUSE she will be called as a witness by the defense.
Now, that said, why would defense put Shellie on as a witness? My thinking is that, again please correct me if I am wrong, but doesn’t Shellie have a right not to testify. I thought a wife has the right not to testify against her husband. I would think that the defense would take advantage of that. The PayPal account is an event that happened AFTER the shooting. It concerned a court proceeding on the bond issue, not the shooting or events leading up to the shooting itself.
I don’t think the defense should call Shellie, and Shellie should use her right of not having to testify against her husband.
Now please straighten me out so I can get this issue off the table and out of my brain.
The defense didn’t put Shellie on their list. They used a boilerplate text that said something to the effect of “Any witness identified through State’s discovery not otherwise disclosed herein.”
The State is saying that this blanket statement encompasses Shellie Zimmerman, so she is therefore a “listed witness.”
It is my contention that one of the biggest showdowns of the trial will be when Norm Wolfinger takes the stand. BDLR will have to argue why Angela Corey’s team should be given greater credibility than Norm Wolfinger’s team who concluded that GZ had committed no crime at all.
Looking for some tech support. I run the Captain Long Schlong Silver youtube channel and have about 130 case related videos. I tried to record the April 30th hearing using SnagIt but I could only record about ten minutes before it would get “stuck”. Not sure if it was my connection, the software, or the stream. Any suggestions are appreciated. https://www.youtube.com/user/CaptainLongSchlongSi
I think the GPS story will prove far more interesting than the DeeDee one. Why is that not coming up at the next hearing? Here is some interesting reading from http://pursuitmag.com/locating-mobile-phones-through-pinging-and-triangulation/ which describes the situation in 2008!
“New generation cell phones and mobile service providers are required by federal mandate, via the “E-911″ program, to be or become GPS capable so that 911 operators will be able to determine the location of a caller who is making an emergency phone call. When a new digital cell phone is pinged, it determines its latitude and longitude via GPS and sends these coordinates back via the SMS system (the same system used to send text messages). This means that in instances where a fugitive or other missing person has a GPS enabled cell phone (and that the phone has power when being polled, or pinged) that the cell phone can be located within a reasonable geographic area- some say within several feet of the cell phone”.
So Noffke, if we can believe the above, knew exactly where Zimmerman was at each moment of the NEN call. Wasn’t that information recorded along with the audio?
This is important stuff. Evidence based on real science is. The fascination with Alan Reich and DeeDee is misplaced. I seriously doubt a jury will take them seriously.
My understanding is that that information is protected via one of a dozen or so telecommunications acts and privacy laws. They cant release that data publicly without a court order to do so. We wont see those ping logs until an actual trial, and possibly not even then.
Does anyone have an idea of what the state’s theory of the case will be? For example, will they argue that TM made it close to Brandi’s townhouse only to be followed by GZ?
-Mark Martinson
At this point I have no clue
Pingback: May 27, 2013 | State of Florida vs. George Zimmerman
Pingback: May 28, 2013 | State of Florida vs. George Zimmerman
Is anyone else getting serious lag loading and scrolling this page? I think it might have to do with all of the scribd documents. If it’s not just me and it’s the scribd documents then maybe a separate post with just the scribd documents and a link to that here?
I’m fixing that now. It’s from all the Scibd docs linked.
TC will prolly delay rulings. In a bind without knowing what DCA will do with writ. Another might be sent after hearing today.
Yes on delay. Most of the motions to preclude introduction of evidence are too broad, and should be addressed during the conduct of the trial on a question by question basis.
On the expert witnesses, my hunch is that she’ll rule on that later this week. I think she’ll grant the motion to continue,and that will give her time to grant or deny the motion to exclude experts in whole or in part. But, she’s been quick to rule in the past, she has had substantive material (both reports and law) to consider now for more than a week, and I won’t be surprised if my hunch proves incorrect, and she rules on the experts today. I think she’ll allow the voice ID experts, but not the word ID opinions of Primeau.
media lawyers in house
Robert Zimmerman jr. steps in
Talking to Frank who was the first one already sitting in.
Defense team, not all, in.
West in now
A/V guys doing a lot better this time, getting prepared early, hopefully no A/V problems today.
Bernie et al in the house
Bernardo makes his entry. Cousel for the press is there too. The court will likely address the gag motion first, so the press attorney can leave before the arguments on the case in chief begin.
Where’s George at I wonder. I don’t recall a motion for him not to appear. Was there one?
Parks in the house
Jackson, Crump and even Sybrina in now
Judge in
States motion for Shellie to be deposed
atny Simms up
States motion for Shellie to be deposed Granted
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING OPINION AS TO APPROPRIATE PENALTY OR DISREGARD OF LAW
Granted
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY
Granted
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING CALLING OF WITNESSES
Granted
State’s Motion in Limine Regarding CVSA Testing
Granted
None of these motions in limine to be mentioned in opening statements says judge
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING SELF-SERVING HEARSAY STATEMENTS OF DEFENDANT
Granted
STATE’S MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TRAYVON MARTIN
School suspension part granted
weed part granted
Fighting part granted
social media part granted
Gold teeth granted
school partschool records criminal stuff grantedH & I
Trayvon texts part granted
**************************
Trayvon ran out of pot in Sanford may have looked for more in Sanford says O’Mara
**************************
**************************************************************
Video Trayvon taped of Two buddies of Trayvon beat up homeless guy
Sherman Ware comes to mind, lolz
**************************************************************
Why didn’t the judge just make an opening statement saying “All motions in limine will be granted. This train is rolling, and the defense better hop on board.”
She is clearly reading her responses from the letterhead of the BGI
STATE’S MOTION TO LIMIT/EXCLUDE IMPROPER OPINION EVIDENCE
Granted
D-Man, why didn’t the defense file any motions in limine?
I have no idea. They should have I would think. Maybe later?
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER/MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING TOXICOLOGY
Granted
Keep in mind all this granting is mainly for these things being mentioned by either party in opening statements
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ANONYMOUS JURY
Anon before and during, no sequester, rest of motion under consideration during jury selection process, media prohibited from photographing jury
O’Mara mention Jackson’s mom indirectly
O’Mara mentions Jackson’s, again not by name, twitter meltdown last night.
I’m getting a bit of a video delay so comments won’t match exact real time but should be close regardless
Media arguing DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ANONYMOUS JURY
MOTION TO ALLOW JURY TO INSPECT THE INCIDENT SCENE DURING TRIAL
Denied
Bernie says God is in the way of JURY TO INSPECT THE INCIDENT SCENE DURING TRIAL
REDACTED MOTION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL WITNESS DISCLOSURE
Granted, need to be deposed by State, if not denied
MOTION TO ESTABLISH REASONABLE EXPERT FEE
Sort of denied in a way, defense needs to talk to Owen
Friday the 31st at 1:30 hearing for photographing jury? Did I get that right?
Richardson hearing underway
STATE’S MOTION REQUESTING COURT TO ORDER DEFENDANT TO COMPLY WITH THEIR DISCOVERY OBLIGATIONS
Granted
Motion for Sanctions Against State Attorney’s Office for Discovery Violations and Request for Judicial Inquiry Into Violations
Witness to testify against state
Wesley White?
Former state attorney, contacted defense five weeks ago
asked defense if defense received photo of gun drugs underage female
defense did not get them as reply
Underage female? What does that mean? I could only watch the beginning.
OMara talks about it in the presser, when asked by a reporter he will not expound on the nature of the underage female photo, suggesting his has the photo now. He says the state likely might have more information the defense has yet to receive.
Client is Ben Criboss?
Defense asking for suspension of hearing to get witness then continue later @ Friday the 31st at 1:30 hearing Bernies daughter is getting married wants it another day
set maybe for June 6th or 7th
***********
This may be the happy couple.
[Edit DMan, please don’t post personal info like that regarding the State, I really don’t need that bearing down on me, thanks]
I apologize. I’m still shell shocked from the hearing and wasn’t thinking clearly.
no biggie. I realize the intent is not nefarious but it would be used against me as such.
Frye hearing on 6th and 7th
States Third Motion For Gag Order
DENIED, Whew,
Judge hostile towards defense
She’s been hostile to the defense since day one. No surprises here.
I know, she seemed particularly angry there though and I thought there could be a chance she would grant the gag order, thank goodness it calmed down and she denied it
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Understatement of my lifetime
Defendants’ Motion to Continue
DENIED
Discussing jury questionnaire stuff
Jeez, Cris Farley really is not happy with MOM and the Defense.
Camera panned to behind the prosecution table and you could clearly see Robert Zimmerman sitting there, and then Daryl Parks walked in behind him.
Next hearing May 31st 1:30 jury photographing stuff
Fry hearing and motions for sanctions June 6th and maybe june 7th
Court in recess
Not sure why Nelson doesn’t just let the defense know that the trial is going to go in the State’s favor if she has anything to do with it. Thank you very much for attending the most blatantly biased persecution, have a nice day!
presser coming up perhaps
God I’d have loved to be able to hear that conversation between O’Mara and De la Rionda better. I distinctly heard O’Mara refer to Natalie Jackon’s mother, and Bernie looked surprised at whatever O’Mara told him.
Robert Zimmerman jr. demanding State withdraw charges, I agree
Crump et al up now
Crump: “We have to make sure people don’t pollute jury pool”, lolz, hypocrite, dumbass, there’s no polluting here by telling the truth you ass
Crump still claiming George wasn’t questioned, what a fucktard
Sybrina gagged by Crump
awaiting for possible O’Mara at presser
O’Mara stepping up
presser over, I think
Thanks for the YT uploads Dman.
All I could find was Trent versions… and I am in no mood to even bother trying them any more.
Posted at RT… Thanks.
Hey Rumpole. Maybe you can help me. Why the special prosecutor appointed?
Diwataman, thanks to you I just finished watching the hearing. I’m very grateful you were did the work to bring it to me and others.
I posted it on my blog earlier with thanks for others to see to.
Thanks again!
Thanks and you’re welcome. Hey I left a comment on your blog to that schlong fellow who is again making stuff up, did it get caught up in spam on your end?
No. It’s posted. First time commentator’s have to be approved. You passed inspection. 😉
Dear Nettles,
Why is there a special prosecutor?
Thank you.
Two words: Political Influence
That is not good enough.
Do you know why there is a special prosecutor? I have been trying to find out.
Quit fooling around with semantics. Get to the damn point. Why is there a special prosecutor?
Any particular reason you are demanding an explanation from me?
No. But why is there a special prosecutor? Just wondered if you might know. You seem to be a leader of the flock.
I’m the boss around here. Don’t tell the others. 😉
I think there is a special prosecutor because both the police and the local state prosecutor weren’t going to file charges. They said most of what they had was consistent with GZs initial statements to them.
Crump and Co. were putting pressure on, the shooter was racist, the police were racist. He accused Wolfinger and Lee of meeting the night of the shooting and conspiring to protect the shooter.
The Governor wanted to quiet the angry public and he wanted and needed the investigation done by an independent arm. So he, along with Pam Bondi, summoned Wolfinger to his office on March 22nd and asked him to sign a letter requiring a special prosecutor.
Wolfinger did and that same day, Angel Corey was named Special Prosecutor.
Judging from the discovery, Angela Corey’s team investigation George and filed charges. Lots of stones remained unturned.
I can not agree with your points. There is no evidence the “local” state prosecutor was not going to file a charge. Yougottabekiddingme. You still have not answered my question. Phooey. Racist? What happen that? The trial starts next week unless you have not noticed.
@nettles18
I do believe your blog has started to attract trolls.
This is Diwataman’s blog. Coreshift, you drinking?
Yeah, I was wondering too. LOL
I get all the blogs comments for the blogs I follow in one folder. And I’m old(ish) and easily confused. That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it.
😆
Not sure who this is but it does not sound like the doodahdaze that has posted in the past.
It is me. I am figgerin I have been fooled Jor. I been barkin up the wrong tree if ya get my drift.
Sorry no clue about your “drift.” Why so cryptic?
I got sucked in by the race thing. Now I found out it is not a race thing. I barked up the wrong tree Jor. It is not why there is a special prosecutor. I am trying to find out why there is one. That is all. I think it has something to do with victims rights. Not civil rights. If it was civil rights Crump and Parks would be defending the poor blacks in Jacksonville form the Corey. I hope you can understand what I am trying to say.
So, why is there a special prosecutor?
Nettles gave you an informed, educated, logical opinion of that and it is shared by most of us here. I am not ready to indulge into another conspiracy. We have enough already for this trial.
Sorry but you are looking for an answer I do not have.
Why did Wolfinger request a special prosecutor?
Can’t blame a girl for trying.
HOLY CRAP! The trial starts next week!?!?
Are you really doodahdaze? I have never seen such hostility in you but maybe I have you mixed up with someone else.
Nahhh.
All I want to know now is why Wolfinger requested a special prosecutor.a
Why are you plaguing my hearing post with this? Are you drunk?
Here ya go:
https://diwataman.wordpress.com/2013/05/29/why-was-a-special-prosecutor-appointed-to-the-george-zimmerman-case/
I don’t practice criminal law, but it seems to me that TM’s fighting (and filming two buddies beat up a homeless guy) should be relevant and admissible in GZ’s defense whether or not the state “opens the door.”
well, here is a young guy with a documented history of drugs and burglaries, and Zimmerman sees him appearing suspiciously like under the influence and looking in to the houses like a potential burglar. Trayvon’s history of drugs, violence and burglaries is inadmissible because the State accuses Zimmerman doing wrong kind of profilnig – he shoud have profiled a young black guy with a hoodie a potentially dangerous thug and staid in his car/truck. Because Zimmerman didn’t profile Black Trayvon as a dangerous thug, he’s a racist and this is a civil rights case or what I’m not getting right?
And why is Crump always interviewed by the media like a special olympics winner, trying not to pay attention that his talking points are totally retarded and beside the point?
Compared with the people interviewing him, Crump is an Einstein.
The way to get it in is to characterize the evidence as “reputation,” and get people who can testify as to Martin’s reputation. Meaning, in the case of filming the beating of a homeless man, the witness testifies that many people knew of Martin’s attitude (glee? entertained?) toward the incident, and many people viewed Martin as enjoying the prosepct of an innocent and defenseless person getting a beating.
The fighting comes in as it shows experience and ability. How could Martin hold Zimmerman down? Well, he was experienced and capable as a streeet fighter. I think the judge will exclude the contents of the cell phone unless the defense produces a person who was the sender or reipient of the messages.
Pingback: Ben Kruidbos – The State and Discovery in the George Zimmerman Case | DiwataMan
Did someone hack Howie’s account?!
Aside from being MIA, whatch mean?
Its like you read my thoughts! You seem to know so much approximately this, such as you wrote the e book in it or something.
I think that you could do with some percent to drive the message home a bit, but
instead of that, that is fantastic blog. A fantastic read.
I’ll definitely be back.